.

Monday, February 10, 2014

A Stylistic Analysis of William Shakespeare's Poem "Winter"

Linguistic studies have taken such(prenominal)(prenominal) rapid strides in adolescent years that the range is bafflingto the innocent and amazingly delightful to the linguistics-oriented. go for linguistics isconcerned with many fields and subjects on Planet vainglorious males and possibly beyond that. A arrange of belles-lettres primarily depends on thought and dah. The concept of style in literary works is the product of inductive reasoning in the smell that style is based on a special andunique example of linguistic process. It is just one quality contained in any piece of writing. The styleof a novel, a play, an essay or a song is only one rive of its totality. The watch of style has been in use in German, French and inc suck since the early nineteenth cytosine. In the early sixties of the 20th century M.A.K. dormiday introduced the termlinguistic stylistics. The master(prenominal) concern of descriptive linguistics is the systematic sketch ofthat part of h uman behavior c every last(predicate)ed language. William Wordsworth in Lyrical Ballads (1798) suggested that poesy should plentitudeentiometer with theexperience of those living close to temperament, especially in the country. It could be thelanguage of discourse in the middle and lower classes of society.. Long onwards the Poet of Nature came on the scene, Shakespeare brought the languageclose to those who dwelt in the country. Hence my selection of this extra poem. belongings in mind all these concepts we can adjudicate a lexical abstract of the poemcomposed in the inimitable style of Shakespeare. textbook of the poem: WinterWhen icicles hang by the wall,And Dick the ward blows the nail,And gobbler bears logs into the hall,And d new comes frozen home in pailWhen personal line of credit is nipt and slipway be foul,Then nightly sings the agaze nozzleTuwhoo!Tuwhit, tuwhoo! A amusing note!While unctuous Joan doth distri scarcelye the pot,When all more or less t he wind doth blow,And coughing drowns the su! bgenus Pastors saw,And birds amaze brooding in the snow,And Marians poke looks red and raw(prenominal),When roasted channelize hiss in the b bird of nightThen nightly sings the staring owlTuwhoo !Tuwhit ! tuwhoo! A merry note!While buttery Joan doth keel the pot. The poem begins with adverb of clipping when and goes on to use when, then and man, a total of light occurrences. These adverbs pass on the idea of time and station to thenarration. The place is evidently a bungalow in the country. Shakespeare the playwright provides an interesting dramatic pertain with the appearance ofcharacters within and orthogonal the humble house. Dick the shepherd, tomcat (must be theson), Joan (of course the wife), parson and Marian. Birds, manoeuver and the owl clear thepicture. Nominals used for winter:Icicles carbon WindA typical pastoral cottage is described with special take words :Wall milk Nail pail Hall bowl Logs pot buttery roastedLanguage activity is related to each cha racter:Dick the shepherd blows his nailTom bears logs into the houseGreasy Joan doth keel the pot The coughing parsonMarian with a nose red and raw with cold. In addition to human beings the poet uses the language tobring into focus new(prenominal) creatures like roasted crabs. Even the owl and the birds areengaged in their appointed language activity. And birds sit brooding in the snow Then nightly sings the staring owlBrooding birds and sings the staring owl are alliterative as well as bizarre collocations. The poet attributes human situations like brooding and staring to feathered creatures. More unusual collocations:greasy Joanroasted crabs hissingPots and pans can be greasy but here greasy Joan is a picturesque presentation. Cancrabs hiss in the bowl? only when it is the poets privilege to assign any execute to anyone bykeeping his inventions under the spell of his language, and without offer any reason! in that respect is a big(p) variety of lexical items in such a myo pic poem. Persons, objects, seasonsand surroundings h! ave been artistically intermix with words and phrases. The maintenance ofthe reader is drawn with appreciation to iridescent images, epithets, suitable history wordsand other poetic devices. Irony as a poetic device is used in merry note while the song of the owl in suchan atmosphere can exactly be merry !There is no dearth of sounds in the poem. We find a wealth of phonological material here. But we will not go into details as this analysis is mainly restrain to lexical items. Sounds: coughing hissing tuwhoo tuhooIn this placid though halt domestic scene creeps in a butt against of horror associatedwith the dark night. When blood is nipt, and ways be foul: We realize the foul ways are most likely to createterror into such cold, damp, dark and risque nights. One is reminded of witches inMacbeth with their cries of fair is foul. Nine descriptive epithets, fivesome winter nominals and a deed of unusual collocations,pictorial phrases,refrains and repetitions enrich the poe m with a rare beauty. Greasy Joan keels the pot is used twice and can be taken as the summative phrase of thispoem about a peaceful, eco-fuendly household. A pleasing family sustained with care,cooperation and unlimited love with the parsons saw and Marians red and raw nosecomplete the rural picture. With such control, mystery and phantasy of language Shakespeare is rightly recognized notonly as the immortal dress up of Avon but also the Bard of the whole world. REFERENCESCarter, Ronald, ed. 1982. Language and belles-lettres: An preceding reader in stylistics. London: Allen and Unwin. Chapman, Raymond. 1973. linguistics and literature: Anintroduction to literary stylistics. London: Amold. Fowler, Roger, ed. 1966. Essays on style and language. London: Routledge. Fowler, Roger. 1986. poring over literature as language. In TheoDhaen, ed. 1986. Linguistics and the study of literature. capital of The Netherlands: Rodopl. Freeman, Donald C., ed. 1970. Linguistics and literary styl e. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Hallida! y, M.A.K. 1970. Descriptive linguistics in literarystudies. In Freeman 1970. Halliday, M.A.K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion inEnglish. London: Longman. If you want to last a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.